Chapter 6: References

• Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE). 1995. Final Report. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Alberti, K.G.G.M. 2000. 'Multicentre Research Ethics Committees: Has the Cure Been Worse Than the Disease?' British Medical Journal 320:1157 - 1158.
• Al-Shahi, R., and C.P. Warlow. 1999. 'Ethical Review of a Multicentre Study in Scotland: A Weighty Problem.' Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 33(6):549 - 552.
• Bergen, R.P. 1967. 'Insurance Coverage for Clinical Investigation.' Journal of the American Medical Association 201:305 - 306.
• Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. 1998.
• Guidelines on Ethical Review of Medical Research. China: Ministry of Public Health.
• Cooke, R.A., and A.S. Tannenbaum. 1978. A Survey of Institutional Review Boards and Research Involving Human Subjects. In Appendix to Report and Recommendations: Institutional Review Boards, 1-1 - 1-310. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
• Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). 1991. International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies. Geneva: CIOMS.
• ... 1993. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS.
• Council of Europe. 1997. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine. France: Council of Europe.
• DeMets, D.L., S.J. Pocock, and D.G. Julian. 1999. 'The Agonizing Negative Trend in Monitoring of Clinical Trials.' The Lancet 354(9194):1983 - 1988.
• Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 2000.
• 'Secretary Shalala Bolsters Protections for Human Research Subjects.' [Press Release.] 23 May.
• Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (DHEW). Secretary's Task Force on the Compensation of Injured Research Subjects. 1977. Final Report. Pub. OS-77-003. Bethesda, MD: DHEW.
• Ellis, G. 1994. 'Perspectives from OPRR.' In Changes and Choices for Institutional Review Boards: The Inclusion of Women and Minorities, and Other Emerging Issues in Research, 31 - 32. Boston: Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research.
• Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1998. Information Sheets: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators. Available at http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/default.htm. Last accessed December 8, 2000.
• General Accounting Office (GAO). 1996. Scientific Research: Continued Vigilance Critical to Protecting Human Subjects. GAO/HEHS-96-72. Washington, D.C.: GAO.
• Gordon, V.M., J. Sugarman, and N. Kass. 1998. 'Toward a More Comprehensive Approach to Protecting Human Subjects.' IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 20(1):1 - 5.
• Health Research Council of New Zealand. 1997. HRC Guidelines on Ethics in Health Research. Auckland, New Zealand: Health Research Council of New Zealand.
• Human Radiation Interagency Working Group. 1997. Building Public Trust: Actions to Respond to the Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Indian Council of Medical Research. 2000. Ethical Guidelines on Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research.
• International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). 1996. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Geneva: ICH Secretariat, International Federation for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association.
• Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). 2000.
• Guidance Document: Ethical Considerations in HIV Preventive Vaccine Research. Geneva: UNAIDS.
• Kolata, G., and K. Eichenwald. 1999. 'Stopgap Medicine: A Special Report for the Uninsured, Drug Trials Are Health Care.' New York Times, 22 June, A-1.
• Ladimer, I. 1963. 'Clinical Research Insurance.' Journal of Chronic Diseases 16:1229, 1233.
• Lux, A.L., S.W. Edwards, and J.P. Osborne. 2000. 'Responses of Local Research Ethics Committees to a Study with Approval from a Multicentre Research Ethics Committee.' British Medical Journal 320(7243):1182 - 1183.
• Marwick, C. 1998. 'Compensation for Injured Research Subjects.'
• Journal of the American Medical Association 279(23):1854.
• Medical Research Council (MRC). 1998. Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials. London: MRC.
• Medical Research Council of South Africa. 1993. Guidelines on Ethics for Medical Research. South Africa: Medical Research Council of South Africa.
• National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). 2001. Ethical and Policy Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing Countries. 2 vols. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (National Commission). 1978.
• Report and Recommendations: Institutional Review Boards. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• National Consensus Conference on Bioethics and Health Research in Uganda. 1997. Guidelines for the Conduct of Health Research Involving Human Subjects in Uganda. Kampala, Uganda.
• National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). 1999.
• National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans. Australia: NHMRC.
• National Health Council (NHC). 1996. Resolution No. 196/96 on Research Involving Human Subjects. Brazil: NHC. Addition: 1997. Resolution No. 251. Addition: 1999. Resolution No. 292. Brazil: NHC.
• Norton, I.M., and S.M. Manson. 1996. 'Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities Navigating the Cultural Universe of Values and Process.' Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64(5):856 - 860.
• National Bioethics Advisory Commission
• Office of Inspector General (OIG), DHHS. 1998a. Institutional Review Boards: A Time for Reform. OEI-01-97-00193. Washington, D.C.: DHHS.
• ... 1998b. Institutional Review Boards: The Emergence of Independent Boards. OEI-01-97-00192.Washington, D.C.: DHHS.
• ... 1998c. Institutional Review Boards: Their Role in Reviewing Approved Research. OEI-01-97-00190. Washington, D.C.: DHHS.
• Prentice, E.D., and B. Gordon. 1997. 'IRB Review of Adverse Events in Investigational Drug Studies.' IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 19(6):1 - 4.
• President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (President's Commission). 1981. Protecting Human Subjects. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• ... 1982. Compensating for Research Injuries: The Ethical and Legal Implications of Programs to Redress Injured Subjects. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Sharp, R.R., and M.W. Foster. 2000. 'Involving Study Populations in the Review of Genetic Research.' Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 28(1):41 - 51.
• Tully, J., N. Ninis, R. Booy, and R. Viner. 2000. 'The New System of Review by Multicentre Research Ethics Committees: Prospective Study.' British Medical Journal 320:1179 - 1182.
• Tuskegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Advisory Panel. 1973. Final Report. Washington, D.C.: DHEW.
• Vasgird, D.R., M. Hensleigh, A. Berkman, E. Schachne, and C. Trinh. 2000. 'Protecting the Uninsured Human Research Subject.' Journal of Public Health Management Practice 6(6):37 - 47.