Author / Contributor
image for Michael Loui image for Michael Loui
Michael Loui Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor of Engineering Education Purdue University Purdue University More Posts
Parent Resource134
Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research

Added08/24/2009

Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus

Nine role-play scenarios on central topics in responsible conduct of research (RCR): authorship, conflict of interest, peer review, interpersonal conflicts in mentoring, data management and whistle-blowing, professional relationships and whistle-blowing, and compliance with regulations on human participants, animal subjects, and hazardous materials. Each scenario has a professor role and a graduate student role. The instructions for the two roles provide divergent perspectives on the same problem.


Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant EEC-0628814
Coordinated Science Laboratory
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Principal Investigators

  • Michael C. Loui
  • C. K. Gunsalus

Current and Former Graduate Research Assistants

  • Bradley J. Brummel
  • Kyoung Jin Kim
  • Kerri L. Kristich
  • Stephanie N. Seiler

Status of the Project

We have developed nine role-play scenarios on central topics in responsible conduct of research (RCR): authorship, conflict of interest, peer review, interpersonal conflicts in mentoring, data management and whistle-blowing, professional relationships and whistle-blowing, and compliance with regulations on human participants, animal subjects, and hazardous materials. Each scenario has a professor role and a graduate student role. The instructions for the two roles provide divergent perspectives on the same problem. A complete RCR program would include most of these role-plays to give students repeated practice in solving ethical problems.

Because few previous studies have carefully assessed the effectiveness of role-play in teaching ethics, we are conducting systematic assessments of our scenarios, using multiple methods, in multiple departments at Illinois and at Howard University. We believe that role-play can be more effective than traditional methods for teaching RCR because role-plays engage all participants actively in a realistic, difficult situation.

In the formative assessments of the role-play sessions, most participants said that the sessions were worthwhile because they were engaged in the scenarios, and they valued a realistic learning experience. The participants stated clearly that the role-plays captured their attention better than lectures. Furthermore, the role-plays required greater personal investment than conventional discussions of case studies.

For the summative assessments, we interviewed participants about six months after their RCR sessions. In the interviews, we asked participants what they would do in two cases that raise RCR questions, one similar to the role-play scenario, and one different. We compared the responses of the 17 role-play participants with the responses of 13 participants who had experienced a conventional RCR training session. Two researchers rated each response on three criteria: identify ethical issues, understand multiple perspectives, and negotiate practical solutions. For each criterion, we constructed a five-point behaviorally-anchored rating scale. The case analysis ratings were reliable: 40 percent of the ratings of the two researchers were the same, and 51 percent differed by only one point. Overall, the role-play participants performed as well as the conventional session participants on the case analyses. The role-play participants made qualitatively different statements about RCR instruction, however. The role-play participants valued listening to others' perspectives, and they stressed the importance of knowing all relevant information before acting. The conventional session participants seemed interested in merely learning the "rules" of RCR, and they expressed doubt about the relevance of the session to their current research roles.

We are developing a paper-based situational judgment test that could be used to assess what students learned in any RCR sessions. The draft test comprises six cases, each with a range of responses based on participants' responses to the interview cases. We will seek the opinions on the draft test of about 20 experts using a Delphi process.

Highlights:

Show More Show Less
Notes Supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant EEC-0628814 Coordinated Science Laboratory University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Share with EEL Yes
Funder NSF
Rights For more information on permissions to use this material please see: http://onlineethics.org/permissions.aspx
Year 2009
Publisher National Academy of Engineering, Online Ethics Center
  • Mentoring (RCR Role Plays)

    Added10/01/2009

    One of nine role play scenarios developed by Michael Loui and C. K. Gunsalus. This page, on mentoring, includes the summary, resources on mentoring and interpersonal communication, and handouts to be given to various participants. The full role play instructions with discussion guidelines are included in pdf format.

    Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus
    Contributor(s) Michael Loui
    Year 2009
  • Animals (RCR Role Plays)

    Added09/23/2009

    One of nine role play scenarios developed by Michael Loui and C. K. Gunsalus. This page, on research with animals, includes the summary, animals resources, and handouts to be given to various participants. The full role play instructions with discussion guidelines are included in pdf format.

    Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus
    Contributor(s) Michael Loui
    Year 2009
  • Authorship (RCR Role Plays)

    Added09/23/2009

    One of nine role play scenarios developed by Michael Loui and C. K. Gunsalus. This page, on authorship issues, includes the summary, resources, and handouts to be given to various participants. The full role play instructions with discussion guidelines are included in pdf format.

    Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus
    Contributor(s) Michael Loui
    Year 2009
  • Conflict of Interest (RCR Role Plays)

    Added09/23/2009

    One of nine role play scenarios developed by Michael Loui and C. K. Gunsalus. This page, on conflicts of interest, includes the summary, resources, and handouts to be given to various participants. The full role play instructions with discussion guidelines are included in pdf format.

    Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus
    Contributor(s) Michael Loui
    Year 2009
  • Hazardous Substances (RCR Role Plays)

    Added10/01/2009

    Hazardous Substances, Chemicals

    One of nine role play scenarios developed by Michael Loui and C. K. Gunsalus. This page, on dealing with hazardous substances, includes the summary, real summary, and handouts to be given to various participants. The full role play instructions with discussion guidelines are included in pdf format.

    Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus
    Contributor(s) Michael Loui
    Year 2009
  • Human Subjects (RCR Role Plays)

    Added10/01/2009

    One of nine role play scenarios developed by Michael Loui and C. K. Gunsalus. This page, on research with human subjects, includes the summary, human subjects resources, and handouts to be given to various participants. The full role play instructions with discussion guidelines are included in pdf format.

    Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus
    Contributor(s) Michael Loui
    Year 2009
  • Peer Review (RCR Role Plays)

    Added10/02/2009

    One of nine role play scenarios developed by Michael Loui and C. K. Gunsalus. This page, on peer review, includes the summary, resources on responsibilities of peer reviewers, and handouts to be given to various participants. The full role play instructions with discussion guidelines are included in pdf format.

    Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus
    Contributor(s) Michael Loui
    Year 2009
  • Whistleblowing - Data Management (RCR Role-Plays)

    Added10/02/2009

    One of nine role play scenarios developed by Michael Loui and C. K. Gunsalus. This page, on suspected data mismanagement in a research lab, includes the summary, whistleblowing resources, and handouts to be given to various participants. The full role play instructions with discussion guidelines are included in pdf format.

    Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus
    Contributor(s) Michael Loui
    Year 2009
  • Whistleblowing - Professional Relationships (RCR Role Plays)

    Added10/02/2009

    One of nine role play scenarios developed by Michael Loui and C. K. Gunsalus. This page, on suspected data mismanagement in a research lab complicated by uncomfortable personal relationships, includes the summary, real story, and handouts to be given to various participants. The full role play instructions with discussion guidelines are included in pdf format.

    Author(s) Michael Loui C.K. Gunsalus
    Contributor(s) Michael Loui
    Year 2009
Cite this page: "Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research" Online Ethics Center for Engineering 8/24/2009 OEC Accessed: Thursday, September 29, 2016 <www.onlineethics.org/Resources/RCRroleplays.aspx>