Tainted Data: Answer D
As a report [of contract research] is being printed, the
author discovers that some of the data included in the report
was inadvertently invalidated by a technician who did not
follow the test protocol. A delay in the publication of this
report would have a negative impact on other programs; however,
it is impossible to rerun the experiment to correct the data
since the samples have been destroyed. The author of the report
and other experts in the field all agree that this data have
very little effect on the results of the research. As research
director, what do you do?
Answer D: Print the research report with a qualifying
statement about the compromised data, while emphasizing that
this data have very little effect on the results of the
research.
Lockheed Martin's Comment: -5 points
You must work with the customer before you print. If the
customer decides the work should go forward, this would then be
an appropriate step.
Cite this page:
"Tainted Data: Answer D"
Online Ethics Center for Engineering
6/20/2006
National Academy of Engineering
Accessed: Tuesday, May 22, 2012
<www.onlineethics.org/Resources/Cases/Case93/Answer93D.aspx>