Abstract of "Chapter 3-The Status of Women in Science and Engineering"

Author(s): Dr. Marsha Lakes Matyas

This chapter examines current research on the problems encountered by women and minorities in the fields of science and engineering (S&E). The data is categorized into to three classes: undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate levels, and employment.

Undergraduate

According to a National Science Board study done in 1989, 53% of the bachelor's degrees conferred in the United States went to women. However, only 39% of these bachelor's degrees were earned in science, and only 15% in engineering. Within science, the percentage of degrees awarded to women varied by field. Women earned 46% of the bachelor's degrees awarded in math, 45% in life sciences, 31% in physical sciences, 31% in computer science, and 25% in environmental science. These numbers do not show an upward swing in the number of women receiving degrees in science and engineering. Instead, they show a decline from the percentages recorded in the 80's.

The following reasons have been presented to account for this shortfall in the number of women receiving science and engineering degrees:

  1. The number of prerequisite math and science courses that students are required to take has gone up, but young women are less likely to take the final courses (mainly physics and calculus) that would better prepare them for S&E majors.
  2. High achieving female students do not exhibit the same level of interest in science and engineering as do their male counterparts.
  3. The attrition rate of female students who enter into science and engineering is high. The students who leave S&E often attribute it to impersonal and uncaring teaching styles.
  4. Women complain of sexist remarks made by peers. Female students say that these remarks alienate them, and lower their self-esteem.
  5. Female students tend to see financial aid as more of a major concern than male students. Female students are often less likely to pursue a particular career path, due to an unwillingness to accept financial aid.

Graduate and Postgraduate Levels

The National Science Foundation's 1990 report showed that since 1980, women represented one-third of graduate enrollment in social sciences, psychology, and life sciences. These women earned 31% of the masters degrees awarded, yet only 11% of these degrees were within the fields of engineering. The reasons presented to explain this were the same as those used to explain low percentages of women in these fields at the undergraduate level. However, the author stated that there was room for optimism as the percentage of women earning doctoral degrees in certain science and engineering disciplines has shown a significant increase.

Employment

Dr. Matyas used the 1990 National Science Foundation studies to show the major areas of conflicts between male and female scientists and engineers. The NSF study cited five major areas of difference:

  1. Numbers Women are underrepresented in science and engineering compared to their participation in the work force.
  2. Salaries Women's salaries are less than three-fourths of men's in the work force.
  3. Unemployment The unemployment rate for women scientists and engineers are almost double that of their male peers.
  4. Underemployment Women are far more likely than men to be underemployed.
  5. Years of Experience Women in the fields of S&E tend to have fewer years of experience, because women have only recently begun to enter these fields.

In addition to these general indicators, a 1991 Labor Department study showed that attitudinal and organizational barriers exist, such as:

  • recruitment practices that involve word of mouth and hence tend to exclude women.
  • credential and career enhancing opportunities that are often unavailable to women and underrepresented minorities,
  • accountability for Equal Opportunity responsibilities not reaching the senior level executives and corporate decision makers.

Matyas cites research showing almost across the board disparities in salary, promotions, tenures, and responsibilities between women, minorities, and white males employed by academe, industry, and government in S&E. Matyas concludes by advocating an information clearinghouse for publicizing and better utilizing the resources available to reduce barriers to women and minority engineers.

Cite this page: Dr. Marsha Lakes Matyas "Abstract of "Chapter 3-The Status of Women in Science and Engineering"" Online Ethics Center for Engineering 8/3/2006 11:40:19 AM National Academy of Engineering Accessed: Thursday, November 20, 2008 <www.onlineethics.org/CMS/workplace/workplacediv/abstractsindex/sci-eng-prog-3.aspx>


Search